This paper compares the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) and NSGA-III to solve multiobjective sectorization problems (MO-SPs). We focus on the effects of the parameters of the algorithms on their performance and we use statistical experimental design to find more effective parameters. For this purpose, the analysis of variance (ANOVA), Taguchi design and response surface method (RSM) are used. The criterion of the comparison is the number of obtained nondominated solutions by the algorithms. The aim of the problem is to divide a region that contains distribution centres (DCs) and customers into smaller and balanced regions in terms of demands and distances, for which we generate benchmarks. The results show that the performance of algorithms improves with appropriate parameter definition. With the parameters defined based on the experiments, NSGA-III outperforms NSGA-II.
Track outputs, projects, and reports in one place.
Sign in to update your profile, manage outputs, and share results with your institution.
Login
Enter your credentials to access your workspace.
Access to the portal is created by your entity's administration (ISLA GAIA or CEOS.PP). If you have not received the invitation email yet, please contact them.
Recover Password
Enter your institutional email to receive a reset link.